Ethical Relativism Mediates the Association Between Openness to Experience and Negative Creativity: How Morality Shapes Creative Thinking

Ethical Relativism Mediates the Association Between Openness to Experience and Negative Creativity: How Morality Shapes Creative Thinking

Creativity is traditionally viewed as a valuable resource for human evolution and innovation. However, not all brilliant ideas yield favorable outcomes for society. A recent study, "Ethical Relativism Mediates the Association Between Openness to Experience and Negative Creativity," published in the journal Behavioral Sciences, analyzed how personality traits and individual ethical perspectives guide our imagination toward either constructive or ethically ambiguous solutions.

The research, conducted by Marco Giancola, Laura Piccardi, Simonetta D’Amico, Raffaella Nori, Paola Guariglia, Emanuele Cardella, and Massimiliano Palmiero, investigates the role of ethical relativism in this context.


Understanding the Two Sides of Creativity

Cognitive and personality psychology increasingly distinguishes between different outcomes of creative thinking. The study focuses specifically on two dimensions:

What Is Positive Creativity?

This is defined as the ability to generate original, useful ideas intended to bring about concrete, positive, and socially constructive benefits.

What Is Negative Creativity?

This refers to the generation of original ideas that, while innovative, may intentionally or unintentionally cause harm or present ethically problematic and ambiguous implications.


Methodology and Study Participants

To understand the factors directing the mind toward one form of creative expression over another, the research team structured an empirical investigation.

The Research Sample

Participant Demographics

The study involved a sample of 200 participants with an average age of 21.79 years (standard deviation of 2.64 years), predominantly consisting of female participants (146 females).

Measurement Tools Utilized

The participants completed a series of standardized tests to evaluate personality, ethical orientation, and creative abilities:

  • The Openness to Experience subscale of the HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised.
  • The Relativism subscale of the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ).
  • A modified Cartoon Caption Task (a New Yorker-style vignette completion task) evaluated by two independent judges to measure positive and negative creativity through caption generation.

Key Findings: Ethical Relativism as a Mediator

The data collected revealed a clear pattern regarding the factors governing the production of potentially harmful or ethically ambiguous ideas.

The Link to Negative Creativity

The results indicate that ethical relativism acts as a mediator solely in the association between openness to experience and negative creativity. Essentially, individuals high in openness to experience tend to produce creative and ethically ambiguous captions primarily when they endorse a flexible, context-dependent moral perspective (relativism).

The Nature of Positive Creativity

In contrast, positive creativity was not mediated by ethical relativism. Instead, it was directly linked to intrinsic personality traits, such as dispositional curiosity and imagination, operating independently of an individual’s ethical flexibility.


Practical Implications and Future Directions

The findings of this study offer important insights for both academic research and educational applications.

Fostering Responsible Innovation

Understanding the cognitive and ethical mechanisms behind creative processes helps design targeted educational programs. The goal is to integrate the development of creative skills with solid ethical awareness, thereby fostering innovation that is both original and socially responsible. The authors conclude by highlighting the need for future research to address study limitations and explore the effectiveness of such interventions on broader samples.

Scroll to Top